Gardasil HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed In FDA’s Own Words

Environment, Poison Food, Health 9 comments
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed In FDA's Own Words - Conspiracy Reality TV

In fact I’m going to tell you why that’s true. I just finished a special report called the Great HPV Vaccine Hoax…Exposed, and you can find it on Newstarget.com right now, it’s a free report, go check it out at Newstarget.com. I’m going to go through some of the highlights right here and show you what’s really going on with these HPV vaccines. It all starts with this company here, HiFi DNA Tech. This company has a device that actually detects HPV infections. They tried to get this re-classified by the FDA into a class II medical device, which would allow them to have it sold so they could sell it in the open market. To do that, they had to file a petition with the FDA. Now, that petition revealed some interesting documents, showing that the FDA knew in 2003, that in fact, HPV infections, that is the human papillomavirus infection, doesn’t cause cervical cancer. And I’m going to use the FDA’s own documents to show those to you. Here’s a document called, “FDA Approves Expanded Use of HPV Test”. You can find this on the FDA’s own website. This was released in 2003, it’s a press release. And it says quote, “most women who become infected with HPV are able to eradicate the virus and suffer no apparent long term consequences to their health, and that means eradicate it on their own without intervention, without a vaccine. It means that HPV infections are self limiting. The same press release also says that, “although the rate of infection in this group is high, most infections are short lived and not associated with cervical cancer”.

As the petition to the FDA states, and this is also found in the FDA archives, it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV infection does not bear a direct relationship to stratification of the risk for cervical cancer. In other words, there’s no link between HPV and cervical cancer. We have all been lied to. We’ve been told that this virus causes cancer. And that in order to protect young girls from cancer, we have to give them a vaccine. Well, it turns out that not only is that not true, but in fact these vaccines may cause an increase in the risk of precancerous lesions in young girls. Yes you heard me correctly, that the vaccine may actually harm certain women. Now, here’s a study that supports that, it’s called the VRBPAC Background Document. This is also on the FDA’s website, I’ve got a link to it in my special report. And, in this document, read carefully, you will find that the authors of this study are very concerned about the risk of harm to women who receive the vaccine. They even title it “Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint”. And, as it shows right here what I have circled, the observed efficacy is minus 44.6%. That means that the vaccine actually caused an increase in disease by 44.6%. Now that’s in certain subgroups of women, that’s not in all women, certain groups, but it means that the vaccine potentially poses as serious risks of harm to some women. And we’ve been told this vaccine is perfectly safe, right? We’ve been told, no problem, anyone can get the vaccine, they’ve even tried to promote this vaccine for young boys. Did anyone tell them that boys don’t have a cervix? People are crazy, they just try to promote these drugs for anything. It’s classic fear mongering and classic disease mongering for the sole purpose of selling more expensive pharmaceuticals and vaccines to people who don’t need them.

Conspiracies related to this article:big pharma, biowarfare, cancer, FDA, Gardasil, human papillomavirus, mandatory vaccination, nutrition, vaccines
  • Nina

    I’m actually very skeptical about the HPV virus itself. I was diagnosed with high risk HPV this year. I have not been sexually active for two years. During those two years I had my annual pap and no cell abnormalities were detected. This year I was tested and cell abnormalities were detected, I tested high risk HPV positive, and was told that I got the STI through sexual contact. The dates do not match. I think that it is very awkward that risk factors for cervical cancer include having too many children, specifically more than five. I also find it disturbing that men cannot be tested for it, are said to carry it, but not suffer from it (i.e. rarely developing cancer). I know this may be crazy, but I almost feel that this virus specifically linked to cervical cancer and that recently became a hot topic in the media is not sexually transmitted, is not something natural, but rather something that is man-made for the ultimate purpose of perhaps controlling the population.

  • Charlotte

    i agree i think it most certainly is and because of that im not getting my final injection apparently the swine flu jab was suppose to kill off some people but it didnt work that well so this is a new one which could be worst and one of the side affects are infertilty which could be used to stop teenage girls getting pregnant.

  • l

    This is population control. Poison the food poison the women. I want to leave usa. They wanna kill me anyway

  • Sammy

    I didnt know much about the cervical cancer vacination, but I saw it promoted everywhere and when I went to my GP for a check up, she suggested I have it as the government were offering it free for women under 25. I went home, and somehow I knew not to.. intuition or whatever it just didnt feel right. next week I went back and told my doctor I just didnt feel it was safe or right for me.. and she ADMITED she wasnt sure it was!!! She said its being done as a trial to see what the results are and didnt push me to have it at all. Even the doctors know its an experiment.

    SOO glad I didnt get it!! I just want to move away to a nice island and set up my own peacefu life away from the fking illuminati

  • michelle

    I am so glad that I am not the only one that feels this way! I think HPV is complete BS and just a way to make more money off innocent people & to control the population. I was diagnosed at 23 (no children) with high risk HPV, 2 strains of high risk, 1 strain of low risk. My doctor went on about saying how its fairly common, and cannot be tested on men even though they are the carriers. It can be transmitted not only through intercourse but any contact with fluids. There is not way to tell when you contracted it, It can show up at any time, even if you’d had normal paps for years. so there is no way to tell WHO you got it from if you have more than 1 partner.
    I have never had visible symptom at all. but was tested every 3 months for a year and change. and every test came back “pre-cancerous cells present”. I had to get a biopsy every time so they can test for cancer. all came back negative for cancer. when i found out i was pregnant the doctor told me dont get too excited you’re levels are low and are bound to miscarry. i changed doctors right away. my mistake was mentioning i had hpv to the new gyn! they told me they would treat it after my pregnancy. which they did. a surgery where they slice a chunk of the cervix off with hopes new cells will form. they never called me up for the follow up. like they got their money and that was it.
    i just saw this episode of “i’m pregnant & i have cancer” this woman was pregnant with her 2nd, they did a routine pap and was told she had cervical cancer. gave her 2 choices, carry the baby up to 36 weeks have a c section and do the radical hysterectomy, or abort the pregnancy and do the radical hysterectomy so the cancer has no chance of spreading.
    WHAT WOULD YOU DO????
    the woman kept the baby, after they did the radical hysterectomy and told her she wasnt out of the woods they still had to do biopsy to make sure it didnt spread….and what do you know, it didnt spread. And she cant have any more kids.
    i completely believe this is to control the population, & to put $$ in these ppls pockets.
    whats crazy is that because this is considered an “STD” woman are not going to be so OPEN to talk about this since its “shameful” or “embarrassing”

  • Pingback: Gardasil: Still not tested or proven to prevent cancer « The PPJ Gazette

  • Pingback: PPJ Resources » Blog Archive » Gardasil: Still not tested or proven to prevent cancer

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    It is not known whether Gardasil ingredients are carcinogenic. Information in the package insert states that the vaccine is not tested for carcinogenicity. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    In addition, there is the issue of “replacement”, a normal phenomenon in virology where strains which have been removed are always replaced by new ones. It is not known whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

    The unexpected presence of recombinant (gene manipulated) DNA has been discovered in Gardasil HPV vaccine. This may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies.
    In other words, it may be most inappropriate to term the HPV vaccine a “cancer vaccine” as it may increase the risk of cancer.

  • James

    In 90% of cases, the body’s immune system clears HPV naturally within two years.

Close_App
Videos