The environment is being used for a power struggle. The environment is being used for centralized government. The environment is being used to make a one world government. And if you don’t think this is not occurring, just see what is happening in the United States. This is an awakening call that we are facing a battle against those that want to destroy a great United States of America.
The major premise of An Inconvenient Truth is that carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas that drives the temperature of the Earth. The Ice Core data comes from Ice Core’s (?) drill to a depth of nearly 12,000 feet, or 2.2 miles, at the Vostok Station in Antarctica. Like Mr. Gore, the United Nations uses this information to prove that Earth’s CO2 and temperature are highly correlated. And they are right. however a high correlation proves nothing…
…but even the correlations used by Mr. Gore and the United Nations is misleading. Notice they kept the two graphs separate. By doing so, the human eye perceives that CO2 causes temperature to rise. However when the temperature graph is superimposed over the CO2 graph, it becomes apparent that CO2 tends to FOLLOW temperature, not precede it – strongly suggesting that the CO2 does not cause temperature to change, but that temperature causes CO2 to change.
I used to agree with these warnings of climate disaster. I taught my students that most of the increase in temperature of the past century was due to contributions of CO2. The association seemed so clear and simple – increases of greenhouse gases were driving us towards climate catastrophe. However, a few years ago I decided to look more closely at the science and it astonished me. In fact there is no evidence of humans being the cause. There is however overwhelming evidence of natural causes, such as changes in the output of the sun. This is completely reverse from the views on the Kyoto Protocol. Actually many other leading climate researchers also have serious concerns about the science underlining the Protocol. So let’s hear what you’re not being told about climate change.
Strobe Talbott and those who dream of putting the United States under a single global authority, know that Americans will never vote for world government. So instead, they talk about global governance, a global village, a global neighborhood, a global economy, a global commons. That means the sea, the air, and outer space. They talk about reforming the United Nations and expanding NATO. The solutions to the problems they raise is always more international agencies wielding more and more control over American land, private property, natural resources, economy, trade, military forces, and even our personal relationships.
All these treaties are dangerous attacks on American freedoms, national security, land ownership, and private property. Every one of these treaties involves setting up a new global bureaucracy that would have some kind of obnoxious control over American citizens, or our families, or our schools, or our businesses, or our use of natural resources and energy, or our land, and together they add up to what is meant by Global Governance.
It has been know for some time that there is a high correlation between the length of the solar cycle and the Earth’s temperature. An emerging theory seems to fit all the data and offers a far better explanation for the current warming, than greenhouse gases. It has been known since the 20th century that there appears to be a correlation between cosmic radiation and low elevation cloudiness. The more cosmic radiation, the more cloud formation. Several Danish scientists, led by Henrik Svensmark, confirmed that relation in the early 1990s, and found the correlation to be highly significant.
The Kyoto Protocol for instance, to supposedly to solve the global warming issue, will not solve global warming. It has nothing to do with actually reducing the carbon dioxide levels in the Earth’s atmosphere. If you know what is actually happening in that – the developing nations China and Russia and so forth are not bound by that treaty. They can continue to expand their industry, continue to pollute and so forth, forever. And in fact China is basically going to over take the emissions of carbon dioxide by the United States within two years. And so no effect on those particular nations. They can continue just to increase. Only the developed nations are required to decrease. We have the issue of having to buy carbon credits from those third world nations so it’s a massive income redistribution plan to provide money for these third world nations and it will not help global warming what so ever. Even the United Nations admits this.