Over 40 years ago, leading psychiatrists met in Puerto Rico to map out their vision of the future.
“[We] see a developing potential for nearly a total control of human emotional status, mental functioning, and will to act.” Psychiatrist Wayne O. Evans 1967

Their plan? …to create by the year 2000 a range of psychiatric drugs regulating every aspect of human behavior. 100,000,000 people worldwide are on psychiatric drugs. How did this happen? Psychiatrists convinced them they were sick. While generating a healthy income claiming to be medical professionals, psychiatrists will freely confess that their profession is devoid of science.

“We don’t really have any specific blood tests, or other tests that are definitive for any mental illness whatsoever.” New Jersey Psychiatrist
“It would be neat if it would become much more scientific.” Pennsylvania Psychiatrist
“Well if you go to my office and you tell me that your depressed, there is nothing and no blood sample or whatever… no tests.” Mexico Psychiatrist
“There are no current available tests to verify your diagnosis.” Greece Psychiatrist
“I don’t use any tests.” Massachusetts Psychiatrist
“You do not have a test to say, well it is this disorder and this is the best medication for this disorder.” Germany Psychiatrist
“For many years we thought we had the tests nailed down, but it turned out that they weren’t of any value.” Michigan Psychiatrist

Everyday, psychotropic drugs cause serious adverse reactions. And, while psychiatrists and drug companies fully understand that dangers of the drugs they sell, their unsuspecting customers are left to suffer the consequences.

How do you market a drug that restores the chemical balance, or corrects a chemical imbalance in good conscious if you don’t even know what one is?

An estimated half of all Americans who commit suicide are on psychotropic drugs. Annually, psychotropic drugs are estimated to kill more than 2 1/2 times more people than are killed by homicide. And who is entrusted with protecting the public against these dangerous psychotropic drugs? In the United States it is the Food and Drug Administration, FDA, whose psychiatric drug advisory panels are dominated by psychiatrists who shuttle between the drug industry, academia, private practice, and government. The so called “revolving door”.

The panels that are formed by the FDA to evaluate these drugs, the psychiatrists who are on those panels, almost all of them have conflicts of interest where they have directly or indirectly received funding from the very industry and the very parties within the industry, whose drugs they are evaluating.

Take for example the FDA drug evaluation panel, that approved the anti depressant Paxil. Every psychiatrist on that panel has financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. And these conflicts of interest have been random enough to prompt congressional investigation.

And this network of financial conflict of interests between psychiatry, the drug industry, and the FDA, became even more entrenched in 1992 after passage of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, also known as PDUFA. Through this bill the FDA would be paid a fee of $100,000 dollars per drug to ensure that psychotropic medications would be rushed through the approval process and into the hands of prescribers faster than ever.

So, what is the national deb? When government spends more than it collects in taxes, it has to borrow the difference by selling interest bearing IOUs, such as US bonds. When a US bank buys a $100 dollar US bond, it gets to loan out ten times that amount. So, the bank not only gets back the $100 dollars plus interest from the Federal Government, it gets to loan out another $1000 dollars it doesn’t have and charge additional interest. Banks are allowed to create this extra money out of thin air. So, banks aren’t making just 6% interest, for example, they are really making over 1000% interest. That’s why bank buildings are the biggest in every town on the planet.

This system of lending way more than you have is called fractional reserve lending. Almost all our money is created by banks, lending it to people, to companies, or government.

As we’ll see, there is a better way for our government to get money. Simply issue it without debt for the benefit of all citizens equally. Abraham Lincoln did it. Ben Franklin did it, Jefferson wanted to do it. Honest Americans have fought against this bank controlled-debt money system throughout American history. But unless we change it soon most of our freedoms will soon be lost in a tidal wave of debt.

75 years ago an employee of the Atlanta Federal Reserve explained the importance of the debt money system and how it can strangle our economy:
“Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation… If the Banks create ample money we are prosperous if not we starve when one gets the complete grasp of the picture the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is incredible… It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon.” -1934, Robert H. Hemphill, credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Nobody’s talking about the debt problem as such. They’re talking about the fact that the the bankers aren’t making enough money to live in the way that they’re accustomed to.

After 600 years, the money changers were finally able to reassert their control over English money when they convinced the Parliament to create the Bank of England. This put the banking community back in control of manipulating the quantity of English money. Now England had to borrow its money supply from banks and pay interest on it, instead of the government simply issuing its own money without such debt. So in England we learned that simple sticks of wood broke the monopoly of gold money. This debt free money lasted for seven centuries and allowed a small island nation to rule the waves and freedom to root deeply in the new middle class, With the goldsmiths back in control, England was now financing its wars with this bank loaned money.
Just 75 years later, England’s war debts consumed 75% of its budget. Three quarters of British taxes were spent just on paying the interest on its war bonds. As a result England needed to squeeze more and more money from all her colonies to pay the interest on this new growing debt.

America was no exception.

Pre-revolutionary America was still relatively poor. There was a severe shortage of precious metal coins to trade for goods. So the early colonists were increasingly forced to experiment with printing their own homegrown paper money. This paper money was called Colonial Scrip. Colonial scrip was a dangerous concept for bankers. It broke the colonies free of the privately owned central banking system where a money had to be created by banks and then loaned to governments, as Franklin put it:
“In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. …we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.” – Benjamin Franklin

In 1764 the British Parliament passed the Currency Act. Again it ordered all Americans to pay their taxes in gold or silver coin. For those who believe that a return to a gold backed money is the answer for America’s current monetary problems, look what happened to America after the Currency Act of 1764 was passed. As Franklin put it:

“In one year, the the conditions were so reversed that the prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.” -Benjamin Franklin.

To Ben Franklin, this return to a gold money system was the basic cause of the American Revolution.

“The Colonies would have gladly borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction.” -Benjamin Franklin.

Americans were mad and did everything they could to get around Britain’s gold money system. In 1765 Parliament past the Stamp Act, requiring that every item sold had to have a stamp placed on it indicating that a tax had been paid on that item and paid in gold. This is what drove America to open revolt.

Do you understand what that means? Without gold you could literally buy or sell nothing. Why? Because the British had successfully forced the colonies to pay for everything using only a precious commodity, gold. This is the very definition of the word plutocracy, ruled by the rich.

By the outbreak of the revolution in 1775, the colonies started printing a new form of paper money to finance the war. I was called Continental Currency. Because unlike Colonial Scrip, it was the first issued by the new central government. Continentals worked great at first, but then the British started counterfeiting it massively sending it to America literally by the bail. By the end of of the war the currency was virtually worthless, as George Washington lamented: “A wagon load of money will scarcely purchase a wagon load of provisions.”

Earlier Colonial Scrip has worked, because just enough was issued to facilitate trade and counterfeiting was minimal. In other words the quantity was controlled by the government that issued it. Gold bugs today try to claim that because paper money didn’t work during the Revolutionary War, it shouldn’t be used today. But keep in mind it doesn’t matter what backs your money. All that matters is who controls its quantity. Will it be your elected officials? Or will it be some unelectable banker? Colonial paper money, before the revolution had worked so well, that the Bank of England had Parliament outlawed, and forced America to use only gold money. Gold which they controlled.

On our next stop on the yellow brick road, which represents the bankers gold money system, we find how the curse of the privately owned central bank first came to America.

In 1781 towards the end of the war, the Continental Congress met here in Philadelphia. They pondered what to do about their grave financial situation. The money was so worthless that the people papered their walls. Congress finally agreed to give a group of bankers a monopoly on creating US money by loaning it to the Government. It was the first privately owned central bank. The plan of course was modeled on the bank of England. The new bank would be called the Bank of North America. It would be the first of a string of controversial privately owned central banks which Congress would charter, and then in the face of public outrage, uncharter over the years.

Four years later in 1785, the value of the new currency had plummeted. Inflation was rampant. Prices had risen by 72%. So after a stiff battle, Congress killed this, the first privately owned central bank in America.

Two years later when it came time to write the Constitution in 1787, many of the delegates did not remember how well America’s government issued paper money had worked in Pennsylvania. They were still stung by the inflation of the Bank of North America and the hyper inflation during the revolution, primarily caused by British counterfeiting. Strangely the Constitution allows the Federal Government to borrow money, but is silent on the federal role on printing paper money, known in the language of the day as emitting Bills of Credit. This defect in the Constitution is at the root of all our economic problems today.

Two years after the Constitution was signed, debt free money was tried in Sweden in 1789, but with tragic results. To pursue a war with Russia, King Gustav III persuaded the Swedish Parliament to print debt free money called riksdalers. This was very costly to the bankers. Sweden had learned the secret to printing its own money without debt. In 1792, only three years into the experiment, King Gustav was assassinated by money lender Jacob Johan Anckarström. As is frequently the case in time of war, too many riksdalers were printed. The quantity was not controlled. A nation with sacrifice everything for survival during time of war. So inflation ruined the debt free money experiment in Sweden by 1834 just as it had a few years earlier during the American Revolution, again, because the quantity was not controlled.

“If two parties, instead of being a bank and an individual, were an individual and an individual, they could not inflate the circulating medium by a loan transaction, for the simple reason that the lender could not lend what he didn’t have, as banks can do….. Only commercial banks and trust companies can lend money that they manufacture by lending it.” – Professor Irving Fisher, economist in his book 100% Money (1935)

“The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.” – John Kenneth Galbraith economist, author

“The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” – Lord Acton (1834-1902) English historian

Maybe your first experience of putting money in the bank wasn’t quite as heartwarming as this. But odds are, years later, you still refer to the balance showing on your bank account as being your money in the bank. But it isn’t.

If we have a deposit box at the bank, the valuables we put in it are still ours. We’re just renting secure space to store them. In common usage, the word “deposit” means to set something down. But the use of the word deposit to refer to a bank account is misleading. A bank deposit is in reality… a loan. What the amount in our bank account really indicates is how much money the bank owes us. It is a record of the bank’s promise to pay us money, not the money we deposited itself. The difference is important. The truth is, when we hand the contents of our piggy bank to the bank teller, our money becomes the bank’s money to do with as it pleases. All of the money in the bank is the bank’s money. None of it is ours. That’s why the bank pays us interest. We have loaned the bank our money.

This may seem to be a semantic distinction. We know we can go to the bank at any time and take our money out in cash if we want to. But the distinction is not semantic. Nor is it trivial. The distinction is crucial. What happens in banking affects everyone and yet few of us know anything at all about how banking really works. The entire world economy now runs on a system of credit provided by banks. And when that credit system breaks down, everyone suffers.

To make things worse, the explanations for these breakdowns offered by the experts never look at the root cause… namely that, other than cash and coins, which make up just 1-5% of money in circulation, all the money in existence today was created as the principal of a bank loan, with the banks requiring principal plus interest as so-called “repayment”. Not only does this make the existence of money entirely dependent on the existence of bank credit, it makes the system as a whole bankrupt by design, as total debits, principal plus interest exceed total assets, from the moment the first loan document is signed.

As the global banking system staggers towards worldwide collapse, more and more people are realizing they can no longer ignore the realities behind banking as it is practiced today. Many have lost their homes and jobs due entirely to the unsustainable practices of moneylenders. It is time people understood money and the pressing need to fundamentally change the way it works. Clarifying what the words used in banking really mean is the first step. Now that we know that a deposit is, in truth, a loan to a bank, the next question is … what is a loan that we take out from a bank?

When we sign for a loan, we give the bank a pledge to pay the amount of the loan plus interest. In return, the bank credits our account in the same amount as this so-called loan. While we speak of the bank as having put the loan money into our account, in reality, the only thing the bank puts into our account is its promise to pay the money.

What has actually happened is an exchange of promises. Neither party has delivered anything to the other, except matching pledges of debt. So, who is the borrower and who is the lender? The terms loan, lender and borrower are all misleading. The truth is that the two parties have traded promises to pay, and in the process created something called “bank credit” or “checkbook money” that can be legally spent as money.

Bank credit can be spent because we, in our innocence, notice that, each time we deposit into our account, it increases our balance by the same amount. In fact, unless we put something in, our account will be empty. Thus it’s a natural assumption that money in an account is money someone put in. Uh-uh. The account is a promise to pay, not the money itself. In fact, a promise always indicates the absence of the item promised. Otherwise why does it need to be promised? Now, because all bank accounts are just promises to pay, the bank and the borrower can simply exchange promises and, in the flash of a few keystrokes, a positive balance appears in the borrower’s bank account without anyone putting existing money in.

Now you know the real source of what we call a “bank loan”.

“Commercial banks create checkbook money whenever they grant a loan, simply by adding new
deposit dollars in accounts on their books in exchange for a borrower’s IOU.” – Federal Reserve Bank of New York, I Bet You Thought, p.19

How different would it be if two parties just got together in a basement with a printing press and created new money that way? We intuitively understand the act of fraud called counterfeiting. In printing fake $100 dollar bills, the counterfeiters also create new money out of thin air.

Money gives us the ability to purchase the real goods & services of the world. It’s clear that the counterfeiters have created new ability to purchase real goods & services without giving anything in exchange… except a fancy piece of paper. Counterfeiters get something for nothing, directly at the expense of whoever gets caught with their counterfeit money. And if the counterfeit money is not discovered, it dilutes the money supply, stealing from everyone. Counterfeiting is a serious crime and it is easy to understand why. It’s cheating on a basic social agreement… Thou shalt not steal.

But, taking a loan from a bank also creates new purchasing power. However, instead of being considered a form of theft, it is the very basis of our monetary system. How did one form of creating money out of thin air become a crime, and the other become standard business practice and the source of almost all our money? For this is what has happened.

To understand how, we need to look at the history of the laws governing commerce, but before that, we need to understand the logic of the loan process itself.

The borrower wants to purchase an item but doesn’t have the funds to do so at the present time. However the borrower does have confidence in having sufficient funds over time to pay both the original price of the item and the interest on a loan. So he goes to a bank to arrange a loan. The borrower is capable of making a credible promise of money in the future, but otherwise, at this moment, he comes with empty pockets. That’s why he needs the loan.

We’re probably all familiar with what happens next. The bank gets the borrower to sign an agreement in which the borrower promising to pay the bank the amount of the loan plus interest or, in default, surrender to the bank the object that is to be purchased with the loan. This is done countless times every day all over the world, but there’s a problem. How can the borrower pledge as collateral something that the borrower does not yet own? If I wanted to borrow $10,000 from you to go on a luxury cruise to Europe, would you accept my
neighbour’s car as collateral?

Of course not, because you know very well that I have no legal right to give you my neighbour’s car no matter how much I owe you. But, if instead, I promise to buy my neighbour’s car with the $10,000 you lend me, the situation is different. You might agree to lend me the $10,000 believing I will buy the car and will pledge it as collateral for the loan once I obtain legal title to it. However, until the transaction is completed, your $10,000 loan cannot be secured by title to the car. This sequence of events problem could be very simply avoided. You could buy the car and then sell it to me.

The bank could do it this way too. If the borrower commits to the bank to buy the item, why doesn’t the bank just buy it with its own money and then sell it to the borrower on time payments at interest? Well… the answer to that question is also very simple. It’s because the bank, like the borrower, has come to the transaction with empty pockets. The bank fulfills its part of the so-called loan transaction by creating an “account” for the borrower. The truth is… the so-called borrower has funded his own account by fraudulently pledging a car he does not yet own, as collateral. And the bank, the so-called lender, hasn’t put up any existing money at all…and, if all goes well, it never will.

In 1935, we have the Historian Tocqueville in his review of America and in review of the genres that were going on of his time, wrote these words. He said “I fear that the productions of democratic poets may often be surcharged with immense and incoherent imagery with exaggerated descriptions and strange creations, and that the fantastic beings of their brains may sometimes make us regret the world of reality“.
You think that’s old? Plato was doing the same thing in 300 BC when he warned about the artists quote/unquote, this has been misinterpreted by many scholars, but he just said that the artists quote/unquote, if they’re given too much dominion over the mind, there will be a decline of civilization. I believe that he was aware of people even then who are still with us, still operating within our society today. Don’t believe it? Here’s a quote. It says “I think we are destroying the minds of America and that has been one of my lifelong ambitions“. (John Kricfalusi, creator of the Ren and Stimpy Show)

“Children’s television and MTV, in fact, are the easiest places to launch counterculture missiles. The more harmless or inane the forum, the more unsuspecting the audience.” Douglas Rushkoff

These individuals, they do go back a long way and they have understood completely your psyche. They’ve had generations, centuries to study it. Their type of sorcery involves different kinds of techniques, but it’s still the same effect – Tele-hypnosis, Metacontrast, Hemisync, Synaesthenia, Embedding – new names, new terms, but for a very old well known practice to get you into group think and subservience. To get you to embody dialectical divisions to which there is no end in our society. To fashion your allegiances for you. To plant associations that your mind might not normally associate.

If you are still smarting from the economic collapse in 2008, you’d better buckle your seat belt Dorothy, because Economic Armageddon is coming and the MSM (main stream media) is not talking about it.

A handful of patriots are voicing the issue, but no one is listening.

There are events unfolding and some yet to unfold that will leave you wondering how you are going to survive.

The mortgage problem, the unemployment problem, the shipping problem, the Afghanistan surge problem, etc.

A Perfect storm is brewing and nobody seems to care.

Add to it, the Biden, Powell, et. al. prophetic words of an impending or potential (almost certain) “terrorist” attack and you’ve got a complete and total Collapse (with a capital C) of the economy.

We’re talking destitute Americans in the streets. No money, no food, no homes, no employment…

California which represents 1/3 of the US GDP is talking about issuing I.O.U.’s. Imagine calling your bank and saying, hey, all I have this IOU from the state, can I pay my mortgage with it?

I’m trying to connect the dots, but you need to read the information.

Hopefully you will arrive at the same conclusion before it’s too late.

Shipping rates hit zero as trade sinks

“Freight rates for containers shipped from Asia to Europe have fallen to zero for the first time since records began, underscoring the dramatic collapse in trade since the world economy buckled in October…It has spread to core trade of finished industrial goods, the lifeblood of the wold economy.” Telegraph.co.uk Jan. 15, 2009

“A report by ING yesterday said shipping activity at US ports has suddenly dived. Outbound traffic from Long Beach and Los Angeles, America’s two top ports, has fallen by 18pc year-on-year, a far more serious decline than anything seen in recent recessions.

‘This is no regular cycle slowdown, but a complete collapse in foreign demand,’ said Lindsay Coburn, ING’s trade consultant.” Telegraph.co.uk Jan. 15, 2009

If that doesn’t make you shudder, then I suggest you go back to watching American Idol, or whatever mundane task you were doing, because you just don’t get it.

It means goods are not being shipped, think empty store shelves, because that’s what is next.

Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans

“According to Huxley Somerville, a director at Fitch Ratings, $29 billion of these loans will reset by the end of 2009 and another $67 billion in 2010. The drastic increases anticipated on each loan are expected to cause delinquencies to more than double.” Motley Fool

The Coming Tsunami

The Mortgage problems are not over yet. If “Revelation” of the Subprime mess shook the Dow from 13,028 in June to a bottom of 7,552 on Nov. 20, 2008, what kind of effect can we expect from the ARM, ALT A, Agency loans that will start resetting in 2009?

Citi exposed to $60 billion in subprime loans – may need more cash.

“I would argue that the $18.3 billion in Alt-A loans are just as suspect and dangerous to the company as the subprime loans. While many subprime loans are made to homeowners with bad credit, the Alt-A loans were made to specuvestors with little or no documentation that will be unable to afford the new mortgage payments when these Alt-A loans reset or recast in the near future.” Huliq News

And that’s just Citibank. When are Fannie & Freddie, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and others going to announce?

What about the Investment Banks that are still stuck with these loans? What about the US Government who took out interests in Fannie, Freddie and others in the bailout, or as I like to call it, the “sellout” (as in, “of America”)

And NONE of this includes commercial properties/loans. Not one word from anyone, except one person and I can’t find his information.

How much exposure do the American People have in the Commercial market? No one knows.

Unemployment at 16-year high

In December, the number of unemployed persons increased by 632,000 to 11.1 million and the unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has grown by 3.6 million, and the unemployment rate has risen by 2.3 percentage points. Bureau of labor statistics.

Add to that, the Federal Reserve’s audacity to deny disclosure of nearly $2 Trillion dollars. As determined by the court, and I’m paraphrasing, that (bold) We the People are not party to what the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) does with its money.

Suddenly, conspiracy theories start to play themselves out…

North American Union
Civil Unrest
Martial Law
One World Government…

Sadly, I do not have a solution. I do however subscribe to the ideas that Peter Schiff and Ron Paul and other brave patriots have stated.

*Let the economy fix itself
*Stop printing money
*Let’s return to the Gold Standard
*Merge the Fed with Treasury (an Actual Government Entity)

You’d better be ready. Start preparing and don’t get caught in the downdraft.

The fact that shipping hit Zero in Europe means you’d better start stocking up on essentials.

We conspiracists have been telling you for months.

These are my opinions.

New York, New Jersey, Michigan, MA, TN, and many other states are depleting or have depleted Unemployment funds.

States are asking the Federal Gov for a Bailout. ($1 Trillion)

Obama asked for $875 BILLION plus the $300 Billion from TARP.

“The president-elect would devote 40% of the $775 billion to give taxpayers a break, but his party is urging him to put more into roads, bridges and other projects.” L.A. Times

That’s right, Democrats don’t want you to have tax breaks, they want to give it to big companies and government to “build” our infrastructure. You know, eh hmm, their friends.

Any guesses as to who might get a lion share of the contract (s)?

Halliburton and KBR

Halliburton announced that it would relocated it’s Texas based World Headquarters from Texas to Dubai. It will still maintain a corporate US office in Texas, but the CEO is moving UAE. (ABC news 03/11/2007)

Halliburton is no longer an American company, but they will probably get the contract, along with KBR.

The Federal Reserve is Printing More Money, thereby increasing Our National Debt. If you add up all debts and liabilities, it adds to about $53 Trillion (look it up).

Yet, Executives are getting Bonuses

And Nobody is disclosing where the money is.

* AIG ‘Retention Pay’ Rises to $619 Million

* Detroit CEOs to Get $1 Per Year? Not Quite. (see story)——>

* Morgan Stanley, which has received no less than $10 billion in bailout funds, paid out $2 billion in bonuses this year, according to The New York Times.

* Goldman Sachs, another beneficiary of billions in TARP funds, reportedly rewarded some employees with $200,000 cash bonuses.

* Members of the US Congress started 2009 with a 2.8 cost of living increase ($4,700 for 535 members) which amounts to about $2.5 Million.

” ‘ All 2.7 million federal employees receive a cost of living adjustment most years, which this year has been set at 2.8 percent for members of Congress and other senior federal officials, and 3.9 percent for rank-and-file employees,’ said Congressman Mike Thompson.” Lake County News

Bank of America just got a $25 Billion infusion, on top of the $15B from October. But they still plan on FIRING 35,000 employees.

BA stock went from $38 on Oct. 1, 2008 to $7 as of Jan. 16, 2009.

Do you remember the Secret FISA meeting from Mar. 13, 2008?

What was discussed?

There are several videos, but here is the list:

1. The Imminent Collapse of the US Economy to occur sometime in Late 2008.

2. The Imminent Collapse of the US Government Finances to occur sometime in Mid 2009.

3. The Imminent possibility of Civil War inside the US as a result of the collapse.

4. The Advance Roundups of insurgent US Citizens who are likely to move against the Government.

5. The Detention of those rounded up at Rex84 camps constructed throughout the US.

6. The possibility of public retaliation against members of congress for the collapse.

7. The Location of safe facilities for members of congress and their families to reside during this massive civil unrest.

8. The Necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada and Mexico establishing the North American Union.

9. The issuance of a new currency called the Amero for all three nations as an economic solution.

The problem is since 1864 we’ve had a debt based banking system. All our money is based on government debt. We cannot extinguish government debt without extinguishing our money supply. That’s why talk of paying off the national debt without reforming our banking system is an impossibility. That’s why the solution does not lie in discussing the size of the national debt rather it lies in reforming our banking system.

well what we’re about to show you is that there’s nothing federal about the Federal Reserve and there are no reserves. The name is a deception created back before the Federal Reserve Act was passed, in 1913, to make Americans think that America’s central bank operates in the public’s interest. The truth is that the Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by private stockholders and run purely for their private profit.

The Federal Reserve really, even though it is not part of the federal government, it is more powerful than the federal government. It’s more powerful than the president, the congress, and the courts. Now a lot of people challenge me on that but let me prove my case. The Federal Reserve determines what the average persons’ car payment is going to be… what their house payment is going to be, and whether they have a job or not and I submit to you that’s total control. And the fed is the largest single creditor of the United States government. …The borrower is servant to the lender…

When his son Mayer Amschel Bauer inherited the business, he decided to change his name to Rothschild. Amschel soon learned that loaning money to governments and kings was more profitable than loaning to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nations taxes.

By cooperating within the family the Rothschilds soon grew unbelievably wealthy. By the mid 1800s they dominated European banking and were certainly the wealthiest family in the world. They financed Cecil Rhodes making it possible for him to establish a monopoly over the diamond and gold fields of South Africa. In American they financed the Harrimans and railroads. The Vanderbilts and railroads and the press. And, Carnegie and the steel industry among many others.

“The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one block, and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination of the world.” –Otto Von Bismark

Lincoln understood who was really pulling the strings and what was at stake for the American people. This is how he explained his rationale.

“The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers… The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the government’s greatest creative opportunity…
By the adoption of these principles the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” –Abraham Lincoln

If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic during the late war in that country, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without a debt.

It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.

…claimed that Lincoln was assassinated , not only because international bankers wanted to reestablish a central bank in America, but because they also wanted to base America’s currency on gold. Gold they controlled. In other words, put America on a gold standard. Lincoln had done just the opposite by issuing U.S. notes. Greenbacks, which were based purely on the good faith and the credit of the United States…

They were the men interested in the establishment of the gold standard money system and the right of the bankers to manage the currency and credit of every nation in the world. With Lincoln out of the way they were able to proceed with it in the United States. Within eight years after Lincoln’s assassination silver was demonetized and the Gold Standard money system set up in the United States.

3 years later American the people elected republican James Garfield president. Garfield understood how the economy was being manipulated. As a congressman, he had been chairman of the Appropriations Committee and was a member of Banking and Currency. After his inauguration he slammed the money changers publicly in 1881.

Whosoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce… And when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.

Unfortunately, within a few weeks of making this statement
on July 2nd of 1881, he was assassinated.

“After WWI, Germany fell into the hands of the German international bankers. Those bankers bought her and they now own her, lock, stock, and barrel. They have purchased her industries, they have mortgages on her soil, they control her production, they control all her public utilities. The international German bankers have subsidized the present Government of Germany and they have also supplied every dollar of the money Adolph Hitler has used in his lavish campaign to build up a threat to the government of Bruening. When Bruening fails to obey the orders of the German International Bankers, Hitler is brought forth to scare the Germans into submission… Through the Federal Reserve Board… over $30 billions of American money… has been pumped into Germany… You have all heard of the spending that has taken place in Germany… Modernistic dwellings, her great planetariums, her gymnasiums, her swimming pools, her fine public highways, her perfect factories. All this was done on our money. All this was given to German through the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board… has pumped so many billions of dollars into Germany that they dare not name the total.” – Rep. Louis T. McFadden (D-PA)

At first Roosevelt railed against the money changers as being the cause of the depression. Believe it or not, this is what he said on March 4th 1933 in his inaugural address.

“Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion rejected by the hearts and minds of men… the money changers have fled from their high seats of the temple of our civilization.” –Franklin D Roosevelt March 4th 1933 in his inaugural address

But, 2 days later Roosevelt declared a bank holiday and closed all banks. Later that years Roosevelt outlawed private ownership of all gold bullion and all gold coins with the exception of rare coins. Most of the gold in the hands of the average American was in the form of gold coins. The new decree was in effect a confiscation. Those who didn’t apply risked as much as 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine; the equivalent of $100,000 today. Out in small town America some people didn’t trust Roosevelt’s order. Many were torn between keeping their hard earned wealth, or obeying the government. Those who did turn in their gold were paid the official price for it; $20.66 per ounce. So unpopular was the confiscation order, that no one anywhere in government would take credit for authoring it. No congressmen claimed it. At the signing ceremony President Roosevelt made it clear to all who was present that he was not the author of it and publicly stated that he had never read it. Even the Secretary of the Treasury said that he’d never read it either saying it was quote ‘what the experts wanted’. Roosevelt convinced the public to give up their gold by saying that pooling America’s resources was necessary to get America out of the depression. With great fan fair he ordered a new bullion depository, built to hold the mountain of gold the U.S. government was illegally confiscating. By 1936, the U.S. bullion depository at Fort Knox was completed. And in January 6th 1937 the gold began to flow into it.
THE RIPOFF OF THE AGES WAS ABOUT TO PROCEED.
In 1935, once the gold had all been turned in, the official price of gold was suddenly raised to $35 per ounce. But the catch was only foreigners could sell their gold at the new higher price. The money changers, who had heeded Warburg’s note and gotten out of the stock market just before the crash and bought gold at $20.66 per ounce, then shifted to London could now bring it back and sell it back to the government nearly doubling their money while the average American starved.