Number one the CEO of BP dumped a third of his stock in the weeks before the spill. Then you have Goldman Sachs that just so happened to have its CEO, being the previous CEO of BP, you have them dumping 44% of their stock, not in other oil companies, just in BP, in the week before. Then you add to that Haliburton, buying, just two weeks before the spill, one of the biggest oil spill cleanup companies in the Gulf of Mexico, which wasn’t seen as a good buy by industry analysts at the time. So you have all of this prepositioning.

You really need to bring China into the creation of a new world order, a financial world order. They are kind of reluctant members of the IMF. They play along, but they don’t make much of a contribution because it’s not their institution.

Their share is not commensurate, Their voting rights are not commensurate to their weight. So I think you need a new world order that China has to be part of the process of making it. They have to own it the same way as, let’s say, the United States owns the Washington consensus, the current order, and I think this would be a more stable one where you would have coordinated policies. I think the makings of it are already there because the G20, in agreeing to peer reviews, effectively is moving in that direction.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency coordinates the government’s role in preparing for, preventing, mitigating the effects of, responding to and recovering from all domestic disasters, whether natural or man made, including acts of terror. Its beginnings can be traced to disaster legislation passed in 1803 to provide assistance to a New Hampshire town following a fire. Following a string of natural disasters in the 60s and 70s, President Jimmy Carter signed executive order 12127 and merged near ten federal agencies into what we now know as FEMA. In March 2003, FEMA joined 22 other federal agencies to become part of Homeland Security. In 2005 Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast and most notably the city of New Orleans. Federal and local authorities encouraged those who could not evacuate the city to go to the Superdome to ride out the storm where there would be assistance to take care of them. This is how your government cares for you. This is a FEMA camp.

Up on screen are photocopies of the Miami Herald. And this goes back to the 1980s when they had congressional hearings dealing with shadow government and martial law. There’s the headline. The secret government and it talks about secret summits and the plans to take over the government. And it shows the people that were in charge of the continuity of government – Dick Cheney and others. And then we have a congressional hearing where we have Congressman Jack Brooks and others during Iran Contra, bringing up the secret plans and they’re told by Congressman Inouye that that can’t be discussed it’s a national security issue.
The truth of the matter is yes you do have those standby provisions, and the plans are there. And the statutory emergency plans are there whereby you could, in the name of stopping terrorism, apprehend – invoke the military – and arrest Americans and hold them in detention camps. -Rep Henry Gonzales

In 1986, under Rex 84, they opened 12 secret army camps to test if they could keep them secret while they held federal, now they hold state prisoners as well. Federal prisoners would then be given a few years off their sentence if they agreed to not tell family about it, and to go to the labor camps. It is a labor camp. And under the revised military rules it allows any U.S. citizen to be put in it under forced labor. Here is the civilian labor camp program Army regulation 210-35. It’s exactly 30 pages long.

This sucker was set up in 1986 at 12 camps. It’s since doubled to 24. And from ’86 to 97 secretly at labor camps, U.S. citizens, non military prisoners were worked on FEMA camps. Now, this was beta testing. They would tell them, ‘You’ll be given leniency and only serve half your sentence if you agree to labor. The minute you don’t you’ll be sent back, on the military bases but you can’t tell anybody. national Security’. You see they were testing ‘Can we keep camps secret from the local police or get them to work with us? Can we keep the camps secret from the media?’ So for 11 years they kept this sucker secret. Reagan, Bush, Clinton. And then Clinton declassifies it in ’97 and they double the number.

Here is Wall Street journal, KBR awarded Homeland Security contract worth up to $385 million, to build 3 1Million person FEMA camps in the United States. It says the ICE Detention and Removal Operations program can be used for illegal aliens and for U.S. citizens and for other emergencies.

The right-left paradigm in the U.S. and U.S. politics is taken directly from the commercial world or the corporate world. In the business world you have Coke-Pepsi. You have McDonald’s-Burger King. You’ve got AT&T-Verizon. You’ve got duopolies. A duopoly gives the illusion of there being some competition and some choice. And it looks a little bit better than monopoly.

They know from previous experience and history that civilizations come and go and dwindle. They know the reasons why they come and go.
Maurice Strong is the man who said that they would never allow another country to rise up as powerful as America will never be allowed to happen again. And he said that the best thing we can do is tear down all the factories, all the top commerce of the United States and level it and give it back to nature. And that was the advice from this character who has tremendous power at the United Nations and was picked up and groomed by Rockefeller himself.
Nations rise and fall. They knew how debt could never be recuperated. They knew that disease and prolonged war could wipe out the population and future populations that pay off debt, so these guys all work together. That’s why it’s no surprise that today you have Lord Rothschild coming out pushing the latest scam or religion that we must all believe in which is global warming. Which his personal bank, his families bank in Switzerland, will be in charge of. They’ve run this system, the whole economic system of the world for the last 2 1/2 hundred years so why shouldn’t they also run the economic system for the next few hundred years.

We’re going into the greatest depression. There will be no job growth. Unemployment will continue to escalate. Along with it so too will crime, poverty, kidnappings, boss-nappings… And the more things spin out of control the harder the hammer is going to come down by the federal government to keep things in control.

To force their agenda through the elites are employing one of their favorite tools, artificial crisis creation, also known as the Hegelian dialectic of problem-reaction-solution.

It’s never been written about in any book that I’ve found as to who gave these guys the authority or permission to be the international bankers of the world. Why would you even need international bankers? Why would any government agree to use them? Why would you need to use them? Why can’t any country create its own money? It tells you there’s already an existing super structure already in existence, maybe two, three hundred years ago to give these guys permission to somehow be the overlords of all money for all countries.

In a video we prepared last week, we described the mechanism behind the four sided ponzi pyramid scheme that helps to explain the present global financial crisis. However this can best be grasped if we can look at this global financial crisis within a much grander scheme which is the so called “new world order”. We hear a lot about the new world order these days. We know something is happening out there, but we’re not quite sure what. in a way when there’s smoke, there is fire and we can see that the New World Order fire is spreading and spreading quickly. Seeing the dire state of the word now our instincts tells us that there is definitely something wrong. Something is rotten, and it’s not exactly in the state of Denmark.

But the excuse seems to be, it’s the new world order and I’d like to talk about the new world order. The new world order really is how we say a generic term. It’s an overhaul. It’s a description of the overhaul to go into the next stage. Let’s look back in history. We had a new world order in 1919, when the victorious allies, France, Britain, and the United States defeated the central powers. Germany, Austria, Hungary, and the Turkish empire. it was very politically centered, but they did get together in Paris, France, to plan out the new world order. And that sort of guaranteed that the conditions were so bad against Germany and the defeated powers that it guaranteed the second world war. But the important thing to at that at that time in 1919, to plan out the new world order they founded two organizations. The New York based Council on Foreign Relations and the London based Royal Institute on International Affairs also known as Chatham House. That new world order had achieved destroying the monarchies, and preparing the way for socialisms, communism, even national socialism and other socialisms. Then we had the second world war. And in 1945, again they meant to prepare a new world order. And what was that new world order? Well after Yalta [Conference] and the division of the world, it was basically splitting the world up between the United States and its allies, and the Soviet union and its allies. And they also prepared a very economically centered new world order. They founded the Bretton Woods Conference, the IMF International Monetary fund, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization. It was the USSR against the USA.

And now when we get to 1991 again George H W Bush Sr announced in 1991 that we had a new world order because the Soviet Union had collapsed and the new world order at that time was globalization. Which was the consolidation of private power and it was the consolidation of the deregulation of the economy and so forth. And what we have today in 2008 2009 the advent of another new world order. And this time the new world order will not be mere globalization it is something much stronger and much more dangerous. It is world government.

So what do they talk about when they say world government. Well first of all, we’ve had world government for much longer than you think,. We just don’t see it. Because we always think of government as something public. With all the trappings and symbols of public government; the flag, the President in the Oval Office, ‘hail to the chief’ when he comes out in his official capacity, military honors, intense media coverage… This is so in the United States, in Europe, in Argentina. Whether its the White House, whether it’s the Casa Rosada in Argentina or whether it’s Capitol Hill. But if you analyze it, the most profound change that the world has undergone in the last 40 years that ‘power’. The capacity to do. The capacity to make things happen in one way and not in another, that power, which is colossal, has been privatized.

<
We talk a lot about privatizations and we think of the telephone companies, the railways, I dunno' the gas company... OK those are operational privatizations. But the real privatization of the last 30 to 40 years is the privatization of power. And this is where public opinion gets confused. Because we think, and rightly so, that public institutions government institutions are there to promote the common good, or at least they should be there... However, if we have a private world government which is run by private institutions as we will set in a moment, there we have a problem, because private institutions really don't have an obligation, a legitimate obligation to work for the common good. Private organizations, legitimately so, work for their own good. So there we have one of the keys to the problem. We have a world government, but it is mostly private, and the private institutions running the world government are not geared or focused on the common good. So what we have nowadays is private power. And private power is the power running the world government. Can we see it? Not easy. Is it a conspiracy? No way. And I'm going to tell you why.

Because the organizations running this, until now private world government, have names, addresses, websites, emails... They issue documents. They publish books. They have logos. They make reports. It's all out there. All you need to do is, like a jigsaw puzzle, put the pieces together.

I would say there are about 2000 of these think tanks, the world over. And since this is very vertical in the chain of command, of those 2000 think tanks 200 are the ones that really count. And of those 200 there are 20 that really have clout. And of those 20 there are 5 that sit at the very pinnacle of this global power pyramid. And those 4 or 5 have names. It's no conspiracy, and I'm going to name them for you. You probably know this. It's the Council on Foreign Relations founded in 1919 when they had to prepare the new world order after the first world war. It's its sister organization the Royal Institute on International Affairs, Chatham House as it is called, based in London; also founded in 1919. It's the so called Bilderberger Conference founded in 1954, and that is probably the most powerful of these 4 or 5 I am going to describe... and that was founded in 1954. And it's the Trilateral Commission founded by Rockefeller and Kissinger and other - the Rothschilds back in 1973 to coordinate the actions of the United States, Western Europe at that time, and Japan. And it's grown ever since. And here's where you can find some patterns which help to explain how this world power, how this world government works.

Hello, my name is Adrian Salbuchi and I’m speaking to you from Buenos Aires in Argentina. Everybody seems to be talking about the global financial crisis. But I want to show you, based on our experience here in Argentina, that there is no global financial crisis. What you are suffering, the First World, is an irreversible global systemic melt down. There’s no way of saving it. You might think, well this is a little bit exaggerated, but I want to show you, based on our experience, perhaps we know better.

I have here a coin which is 1 Argentine peso. This will buy you, well it’ll hardly buy you a bus trip in downtown Buenos Aires. And yet if I were to go to 1970 – in 1970 this little coin would have purchased you Argentina 4 or 5 times after another. Why? Because since January of 1970, we have undergone 4 major monetary changes where they’ve knocked off zeros on our currency. Thirteen zeros to be exact. So this would be worth 10 trillion pesos from that time and 10 trillion pesos at that time would’ve bought you Argentina… 3 or 4 times over. That’s inflation. Actually that’s hyper inflation. So when we hear about your inflationary concerns and everything, we’ve seen that, we’ve done that. We’ve been through the whole thing.

The whole global financial system is a ponzi scheme. And I’m going to show you how this works. First side of the global financial pyramid. Planned monetary insufficiency. The real money in every country – United States, Argentina, Brazil, Britain… Real money is the money that is issued by the state. In other words real “hot money” let’s call it that way, legal tender. Which in the United States is a funny sort of money because it’s issued by the Federal Reserve Bank. And the Federal Reserve Bank is a private entity. Let’s say central banks issue the real money. The dollar bills, the euros, the Argentinian pesos and so forth. The whole system is planned in such a way that there is never real money for the needs of the economy.

There enters the second side of the pyramid. Since there is not sufficient public money, that is replaced, or that is substituted by private money. In other words, the private banking system exerts sufficient control over the state and over the central bank, over the Federal Reserve System, as to guarantee that it will always issue insufficient amounts of money. And in comes the private banking system saying ‘Mr. individual, Mr corporation, Mr. government… you need money? No problem. We’ll give it to you.’And that’s when the banks come out with the fractional reserve system and charging huge amounts of interest. Whereby for all the loans that they make, tey make huge amounts of money. That’s the second part of the pyramid. Replacing real money, with funny money. In other words banking money, Which grows at an exponential rate because it grows based on the fractional monetary system, the fractional banking system.

The third side of the pyramid.Do everything by debt. Consumers are always indebting themselves. Do everything with a credit. Do everything with a loan. If an individual wants something, no problem have it on credit. If a corporation needs to build a new headquarter or a new manufacturing assembly line, no problem. Do it on credit. If the government has to do something in Argentina, the United States, no problem. Just get yourself nicely indebted with all the major private banks.

And you have now a situation where, in the United States for example, the government owes over 10 trillion dollars, that’s your debt indebtedness. Corporations owe about 9 trillion dollars. Individuals owe about another 9 trillion dollars. my country Argentina, the state is indebted over 350 billion dollars and our individuals are also indebted. Everybody’s indebted. Everywhere in the world. Individuals, corporations, states… Everybody owes money. And the key question is owes money to who. Why is the entire planet indebted to somebody?

And the forth part of the pyramid is the one we Argentinians are experts on. And I will call it privatizing the profits, socializing the losses. Because since the whole thing is a model, that model can be predicted how it will react, we know that when this ponzi scheme is growing there’s money all over the place. There’s easy loans, easy credit – “everybody” makes money. And when this is growing, the whole system is planned in such a way, that the channels for the huge profits will go to the private bankers. It will go to the private shareholders. It will go to all the people that they want it to go to. When it gets to a point where this is just going to explode, as happened to you (U.S.) on September of 2008, the whole thing starts collapsing, a new set of channels is activated. And all the losses are socialized. Just as the profits were privatized to the people they wanted to privatize them to, when the whole thing blows down and starts imploding and collapsing, that is socialized by taxpayer bailout plans or via the Federal Reserve issuing trillions of dollars of fake money, which means the entire planet is paying for it.

What you are about to hear will surprise and outrage you. It’s the true story of Europe. It’s the story the politicians don’t want you to hear. Because it shows how they’ve deceived us and betrayed our nation. Only in 1994 did Chancellor Kohl’s foreign policy spokesman, speaking on behalf of the ruling party of Europe’s dominant nation Germany, clearly reveal the true plan. The plan is to create a federal European superstate. Into it will be merged up to 25 ancient European nations including our own. This new country called “Europe” will have one parliament, one government, one court of justice, one currency, one flag, and one anthem. That has been the plan all along. For those who favored it knew the people of Europe would never accept it. They would never willingly surrender their freedoms to become just a province in a vast European superstate. So what did the politicians do? They conspired to keep the truth from the people.

Initially I thought, like everybody else, that we had joined a common market. And what would be nice and more friendly and sensible and economically wise to do? But since then, in 1975 when we had the vote to remain in that so we were told, it’s become one or two things further than just a common market. It then became, a few years later, a European Economic Community. Then a European Community. It’s now the European Union with all sorts of control and restrictions and regulations.

We’re not talking about billions of Pounds, we’re talking about trillions of Pounds. Why a country, which has been independent for 900 or more years, would ever wish to involve itself in such political chicanery and nonsense is something which defies anyone who is sane.

In black and white, the draft constitution wording confirms Brussels will exercise competence and primacy over member states own laws. For the British, this will mean being stripped of any remaining independence. Losing control over our foreign policy and our armed forces. The handing over of our legal system and law enforcement to the European Union. The scrapping of the Pound Sterling to be replaced by the Euro. The handing over of our remaining currency and gold reserves to the European central bank.

For many in this country, the first experience they’ve had with the European union, apart from VAT (value added tax), came when they tried to protest new legislation introduced to limit the amount and availability of vitamins, herbs, and alternative remedies people will be able to purchase and use in the future.